Cantor Proved Some Infinities Are Bigger Than Others With a Single Diagonal
Georg Cantor showed in 1891 that the real numbers cannot be listed. The argument fits on the back of a napkin.
Georg Cantor was a 28-year-old at Halle when he published, in 1874, the first proof that the real numbers cannot be put into a one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers. The argument was technical, working through nested intervals. In 1891 he published a much shorter version. It is the one almost everyone learns now, and it is short enough to walk through in a paragraph.
Suppose, for contradiction, that the real numbers between 0 and 1 can be listed: r_1, r_2, r_3, and so on. Each r_i has a decimal expansion 0.d_{i1}d_{i2}d_{i3}.... Now construct a new number, x, whose first digit differs from d_{11}, whose second digit differs from d_{22}, whose third digit differs from d_{33}, and so on down the diagonal of the table. By construction, x cannot equal r_1 — they differ in the first decimal place. It cannot equal r_2 — they differ in the second. It cannot equal any r_i. But x is itself a real number between 0 and 1, so the supposed list omitted at least one real. The list, therefore, cannot exist. The reals are uncountable.
This was the moment set theory acquired a hierarchy. The natural numbers, the rationals, the algebraic numbers — all are 'countably infinite,' the smallest size of infinity, which Cantor labeled aleph-zero. The reals are strictly larger. Cantor's continuum hypothesis asked whether there is anything in between. Kurt Gödel showed in 1940 that the hypothesis cannot be disproved from the standard axioms; Paul Cohen showed in 1963 that it cannot be proved either.
Cantor's contemporaries were not all impressed. Leopold Kronecker, his former teacher, called the work the work of a 'corruptor of youth' and blocked Cantor from senior positions. Cantor spent later years in and out of mental hospitals. He died in 1918. The diagonal survives him.
Make Recess yours.
Sign in to save the ones you loved, never see the same thing twice, and tell us what you want more of.